|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
953
   |
Posted - 2014.11.14 16:59:52 -
[1] - Quote
can't you take off the spikes on the enyo please!! .. at the very least add them to both sides not just one!!! i hate asymmetrical stuff
also couldn't the ishkur use the tristan model , it is the T1 droneboat ???
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
953
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 17:00:49 -
[2] - Quote
you should take out the visual dronebay on the onyx and eagle since they don't have any drones or dronebay .. just plate it over like the other side.
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
953
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 17:16:15 -
[3] - Quote
my falcon thanks you ... now if only you could jam all those droneboats that are so prevalent (mainly cos they are OP)
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
953
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 17:23:23 -
[4] - Quote
DaReaper wrote:Anonymous Forumposter wrote:DaReaper wrote:Anonymous Forumposter wrote:Querns wrote:This is inaccurate You're right. -áALL shattered wormholes are getting the potential for random ice anomalies. However, this is also incorrect. It's the 75 "Standard" wormholes that will get the ice. No you are incorrect, from the blog: " The twenty five Small Ship Shattered Wormhole Systems will have all the features of the normal Shattered Wormhole Systems, with the following additions: " So again... how do we mine it? BAH! Barring an oversight in that devblog, looks like you win this round.... It is interesting to think we might get a small scale ice miner. Back when the data mining was going on for the new venture variant, they actually found files for 2 t2 variants (Prospect + ???), and what seemed like a noctis variant. Here's hoping for more ORE ships on the way! Funny this is I know ccp is reading this thread, and they seem to be skipping my question (I posted it in the shattered wh thread and that too was skipped) which means there is prolly something in the works and they don't wish to announce it, incase it not finished. I really just want a 'we are aware' or 'yea no the 25 systems won't have ice, that was a dev blog error'
its odd that ORE is effectively a faction of its own so why don't there ships have the faction icon?
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
954
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:41:30 -
[5] - Quote
now if only the eagle was worth flying...
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
954
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:42:55 -
[6] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:With this kind of expansions there will be nothing left to fix or add in a year.
EVE mutating to it's final form: EVEotron 9000.
 .. they still have WiS too do.. i want too be able too open that door and then.. ride some horses and duel for lolz
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
955
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:53:58 -
[7] - Quote
Anonymous Forumposter wrote:Harvey James wrote:can't you take off the spikes on the enyo please!! .. at the very least add them to both sides not just one!!! i hate asymmetrical stuff You're asking for torches and pitch forks with statements like that.
common sense seems too have that effect
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
955
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:14:42 -
[8] - Quote
Alstevar Eastern wrote:Thank you CCP for the Amarr Tech 3 Tactical Destroyer, it's the concept art choice D, the one i liked from the beginning. 
so long as they don't have ridiculous tank like T3 cruisers(T2 resists and high HP) have they could be good ships
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
955
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:31:10 -
[9] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:With regards to the new pirate faction jackets: Why does every pirate faction have the same design? It does not make any sense that the religiously fanatic Blood Raiders use the same design as the militaristic Guristas or the neurosciencistic lunatics of the Sansha Nation. They need to have different designs!
Also: Fix the UI as suggested in the feedback thread. It is horrible and barely usable at the moment.
the jackets are a bit bland and too samey
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
955
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:41:15 -
[10] - Quote
Alexis Nightwish wrote:IIRC the Onyx and the Eagle both lack drone bays, but their model shows a drone bay. Can these be removed?
that and making them worth flying more would be nice
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
|
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
955
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:54:14 -
[11] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:Harvey James wrote:Alexis Nightwish wrote:IIRC the Onyx and the Eagle both lack drone bays, but their model shows a drone bay. Can these be removed? that and making them worth flying more would be nice What's wrong with the Eagle and Onyx? Haven't flown an Onyx yet, but the Eagle is pretty amazing. The range of the medium rails is absolutely outstanding and I rather have that than more damage. For sniping and long range engagements, the Eagle is a very capable ship comparable to something like Cerberus, Muninn and Ishtar. It's certainly not something for small engagements where you don't have the numbers for sufficient DPS, but if fills a very nice niche role and has its unique usage scenarios.
if i want too snipe why would i want a slow fat effectively brawler type ship that for some reason has lots of range plonked on top of? i can pick a talos too the job with better dps and range without training HAC's too do it or use an ishtar with much better dps and flexibility.
Onyx is atm only worth using in 0.0 or maybe wormhole/ Low sec ops .. ok if you live there i suppose .. although flying them is probably suicide ...
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
955
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 20:04:47 -
[12] - Quote
i would love too know when recons and T3 cruisers are getting there turn for being fixed.. fozzie?????
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
955
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 20:15:48 -
[13] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:Harvey James wrote:Rivr Luzade wrote:Harvey James wrote:Alexis Nightwish wrote:IIRC the Onyx and the Eagle both lack drone bays, but their model shows a drone bay. Can these be removed? that and making them worth flying more would be nice What's wrong with the Eagle and Onyx? Haven't flown an Onyx yet, but the Eagle is pretty amazing. The range of the medium rails is absolutely outstanding and I rather have that than more damage. For sniping and long range engagements, the Eagle is a very capable ship comparable to something like Cerberus, Muninn and Ishtar. It's certainly not something for small engagements where you don't have the numbers for sufficient DPS, but if fills a very nice niche role and has its unique usage scenarios. if i want too snipe why would i want a slow fat effectively brawler type ship that for some reason has lots of range plonked on top of? i can pick a talos too the job with better dps and range without training HAC's too do it or use an ishtar with much better dps and flexibility. Onyx is atm only worth using in 0.0 or maybe wormhole/ Low sec ops .. ok if you live there i suppose .. although flying them is probably suicide ... i still think its silly you cant use the scripted point in high sec .. and be reppable with the scripted version .. along with removing science lv5 as a prerequisite or remove graviton physics from it.. a science skill shouldn't be needed for a combat ship.. then maybe i would fly an onyx in anything other than a wormhole Show me the Talos that can reach 177 km range, both locking and weapon range, with at least some resemblance of tank. The Eagle is not meant for brawling, that's why it has a range bonus and not a tracking bonus. If you want to brawl with blasters, you have to use the Deimos. The Ishtar on the other hand is bound to its drones, you can't fly too far away from the enemy or you can't activate the drones on them anymore. And you constantly need to keep the range of the drones from the enemy in consideration as well. And drones die, which leaves the Ishtar very quickly without anything to fire. The tracking is also lackluster after the last round of nerfs to the Ishtar, whereas enemies always have to follow your Eagle around -- you can fly straight away from them, and have absolutely no problems with tracking. That's the point of the Onyx, of all Hictors to be quite frank. They are not meant for damage or something, they are meant to be tackle for big ships and mobile (the real mobile) bubbles. There should not be another use for them. Sure, a bit more DPS is fine, in order to not have a "worthless" ship in your fleet ... but that is the completely wrong and warped perception of the players, who only want more DPS and don't see the point of different roles in fleets.
i think you failed too understand how powerful ishtars are.. how much did you read the HAC thread??
sniping at 160km .. talos and naga mind can do that just fine .. and who fits tank too snipers fighting at that range anyway??
Eagle and onyx are both niche ships .. they perform one role only well.. neither of which suit HS gate fights .. where as my ishtar can perform either role at just fine..
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
956
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 20:40:02 -
[14] - Quote
Quote:Rivr Luzade ... The Ishtar certainly can't perform the role of the Onyx, that's completely impossible.
perhaps i wasn't clear enough .. i did refer too high sec at this point ... but point being there are plenty of ships than can either snipe or brawl better .. onyx being only useful over the others in certain secs ..
and that my ishtar can cover both sniping and brawling easily in the same fit .. my ishtar covering 150km with 2 DLA's .. but can still brawl better than the onyx
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
956
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:01:03 -
[15] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:Harvey James wrote:Quote:Rivr Luzade ... The Ishtar certainly can't perform the role of the Onyx, that's completely impossible. perhaps i wasn't clear enough .. i did refer too high sec at this point ... but point being there are plenty of ships than can either snipe or brawl better .. onyx being only useful over the others in certain secs .. and that my ishtar can cover both sniping and brawling easily in the same fit .. my ishtar covering 150km with 2 DLA's .. but can still brawl better than the onyx Drone activation range with 2 DLA is 133km. Unless you use rigs. And DPS brawling is not a role of the Onyx, in any area of space. Using it for that and not meeting results like a Sacrilege or Deimos, or your Garde/Ogre Ishtar, is not completely unexpected.
ah yes , i initially played with a 3rd DDA, but felt beside the cpu nerfing the fit in general, that i won't really need that extra bit of range in most circumstances.. actually you can get comparable dps to the sacrilege with the onyx.
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
956
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 21:04:07 -
[16] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Great expansion, except the ishkurs lance...it's not lancy enough. im actually really disappointed about that 
would look better without it .. or at least add it to the other side .. but perhaps they could just leave the lance too the incursus if they really want it too stay that bad and then remove it from the enyo .. might provide a stronger variance in look too then ..
and the ishkur should really be based on the tristan model .
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
958
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 12:21:56 -
[17] - Quote
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:Warde Guildencrantz wrote:CCP BunnyVirus wrote:nonsciolist wrote:can we see PBR difference gifs for the other races also? There will be a Dev Blog about it soon I expect kaalakiota ships to be actually black this time. they are
since they are the T2 missile manufacturers .. why isn't the hawk and cerberus kaalakiota?
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
958
|
Posted - 2014.11.15 12:22:47 -
[18] - Quote
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:Arthur Aihaken wrote:Quote:With Rhea, all ships except T3 strategic cruisers get rendered with PBR techniques. Will T3s eventually received the PBR rendering? Yes
will they be rebalanced at the same time ? and when would this be?
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
|
|
| |
|